Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
Updated: Super Simple High Return Filter Strategies For Lending Club And Prosper
ShareTweet
Home
Peer to Peer Lending
Updated: Super Simple High Return Filter Strategies For Lending Club And Prosper

Updated: Super Simple High Return Filter Strategies For Lending Club And Prosper

Fintech Nexus Staff·
Peer to Peer Lending
·Jan. 27, 2016·3 min read

Even the average returns from p2p investing are appealing to many investors, especially in a low interest rate environment. However, one of the great things about investing in peer to peer lending is the availability of historical data. If you’re a self directed investor there are a few simple filters that could potentially outperform average returns over time. In this post, we’ll outline simple filters for both Lending Club and Prosper.

We are backtesting data on each platform using the beta version of NSR Platform’s new code base (version 3.0), which will officially launch in the first quarter of 2016. These filters are an update from our 2012 post and take into consideration recent loan performance. It’s important to note that Lending Club and Prosper adjusts interest rates over time so while these strategies have performed well in the past, this may not be the case in the future.

Simple Lending Club Filter Strategy

To start, take a look at the below chart which outlines the average returns from Lending Club.

Lending Club Average Returns
This chart includes all loans that were issued 18 months or more before the last day of the most recently completed quarter (Q3 2015).

Since we are targeting higher returns, we’ll focus on the higher loan grades: C, D, E. Grades F and G have higher returns, though the risk trade-off is too high for this exercise.

  • Grade: C,D,E
  • Inquiries in the last 6 months = 0
  • Loan Purpose: Debt Consolidation, Credit Card Refinance
  • Optional: Home Ownership: Mortgage or Own
  • Optional: Annual Income over $45,000

According to the NSR back-testing tool, loans that were originated before January 1, 2014 generated an ROI of 10.00% using this strategy. Over the same period, grades C, D and E with no additional filters generated an ROI of 8.08%. Looking at data from 2014 and 2015 these simple filters generate an ROI of 10.20%. This compares to an ROI of 8.65% without additional filters. This shows that this strategy continues to provide alpha even in recent years. Note that returns shown for 2014 and 2015 are likely overstated since these loans have not yet seasoned.

Lending Club Filters
Lending Club Filters
Lending Club Filter Strategy
Lending Club Filter Results

Simple Prosper Filter Strategy

Below are Prosper’s average returns by loan grade. Keep in mind that their loan grades appear similar to Lending Club’s, but the interest rates differ.

Prosper_Average_Returns
Historical performance of originations from July 15, 2009 through May 31, 2012.

For our simple filters with Prosper, we’ll focus on grades C through HR, which include loans that carry the highest interest rate — and the highest risk — with Prosper.

  • Prosper Rating: C,D,E,HR
  • Inquiries in the last 6 months = 0
  • Listing Category: Debt Consolidation, Other, Home Improvement
  • Optional: Is Homeowner = Yes
  • Optional: Income Range > $25,000

According to the NSR back-testing tool, loans that were originated before January 1, 2014 generated an ROI of 11.92% using this strategy. These results are on around 6,000 loans due to the date restriction, but Prosper has had significantly more volume in 2014 and 2015. The total count of loans now meeting this criteria since 2009 is over 23,000 loans. Over the same period, grades C, D and E with no additional filters generated an ROI of 10.48%. Looking at data for 2014 and 2015, these simple filters generated an ROI of 9.88%. Without additional filters, the ROI is 8.15%. Again, we see that these filter criteria continue to produce alpha.

Prosper Filters
Prosper Filters
Prosper Filter Strategy
Prosper Filter Results

Conclusion

While investors can continue to add filters to incrementally increase returns, these simple filters provide a base with substantial loan volume. Investors should ensure that with whichever filters they select that their cash is always invested, as cash drag will have a negative effect on returns. NSR Invest offers limited free backtesting using their online tools at NSR Platform. If you sign up as a Self-Directed user, you get unlimited back-testing. NSR Invest also offers proprietary credit algorithms through a “Fully Managed” service for 0.6% per year.

Full Disclosure: NSR Invest is majority owned by Cardinal Rose Group LLC, a company that also owns Lend Academy and LendIt.

  • Fintech Nexus Staff
    Fintech Nexus Staff

    This piece was created by one of our content team members. Reach us at [email protected]

    View all posts
Tags
backtestingLending Clubloan filtersNSR InvestNSR PlatformProsper
Related

LendingClub exceeds expectations in strong Q1 earnings

LendingClub delivers better than expected earnings in Q4 2023

New SBA Lending Rules Are Only a Start

lending club q42022 presentation

LendingClub outlines cautious approach to support long-term growth

Popular Posts

Today:

  • Al AgentsThe Scramble to Build the AI Agent Economy Sep. 24, 2025
  • Diya JollyXero’s CTO on building a ‘superagent’ for accounting Sep. 17, 2025
  • Battle of the BotsFintech’s Battle of the Bots Sep. 25, 2025
  • Fintech Nexus – Newsletter Creative (2)The $100K Wall Threatening the U.S. AI Talent Engine Sep. 24, 2025
  • Justin OverdorffLightspeed’s Overdorff on AI Investing Momentum Sep. 18, 2025
  • Zinnia CEO – Michele TrogniThe Nexus Profile: Zinnia’s CEO on Building the Rails for Financial Longevity Sep. 9, 2025
  • 5 Founders Driving Humanoid AIThe Humanoid Era: 5 Leaders Defining Physical AI Sep. 10, 2025
  • AI Nexus HeaderRobots Have Entered the AI Race Sep. 10, 2025
  • Fintech Nexus – Newsletter Creative (1)AI-Driven Commerce & The Dying Art of the Deal Sep. 25, 2025
  • Luke Sikora JPMorgan Growth Equity PartnersJ.P. Morgan’s Growth Equity Partner Sikora Still Sees IPO Upside Sep. 23, 2025

This month:

  • Al AgentsThe Scramble to Build the AI Agent Economy Sep. 24, 2025
  • Zinnia CEO – Michele TrogniThe Nexus Profile: Zinnia’s CEO on Building the Rails for Financial Longevity Sep. 9, 2025
  • 5 Founders Driving Humanoid AIThe Humanoid Era: 5 Leaders Defining Physical AI Sep. 10, 2025
  • Revised-AI-InvoiceAI Faces Skepticism. Startups Say: OK, Pay When it Works Jun. 25, 2025
  • SOLO CeoSOLO’s CEO on the data and banking dilemma Sep. 11, 2025
  • Diya JollyXero’s CTO on building a ‘superagent’ for accounting Sep. 17, 2025
  • Jeff Radke AccelerantAs Accelerant IPOs on NYSE, CEO Jeff Radke Hopes to Usher In Insurtech 3.0 Jul. 24, 2025
  • _Renton’s Take on AI x Banking; Fed Independence Weighs on Macro OutlookFraudsters Beware: Fintech is on the Case Sep. 16, 2025
  • Aidan CorbettWayflyer’s $5B Bet on Small Business Lending May. 1, 2025
  • Fairplay AI – Kareem SalahFairplay’s Kareem Saleh on private sector data maturity Sep. 4, 2025

  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2025 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results