Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
Lending Club PRIME Review and the Difference Between NAR and Actual Returns
ShareTweet
Home
News Roundup
Lending Club PRIME Review and the Difference Between NAR and Actual Returns

Lending Club PRIME Review and the Difference Between NAR and Actual Returns

Peter Renton·
News Roundup
·Aug. 11, 2011·3 min read

Lending Club PRIME Review August 2011
It has been about four months since I gave an update on my wife’s Lending Club PRIME (link to my initial review) account, so I thought it was time to revisit the numbers. I am going to try and provide these updates quarterly from now on. I think p2p investors can learn several useful things from this review.

Above is the screenshot I took of the PRIME IRA account this morning. As you can see this account is earning a 9.73% NAR according to Lending Club with an account total of just over $60K. My last Lending Club PRIME update in April had my NAR at 10.37% and an account total of $58,577. Every month my account total keeps going up.

The Lending Club Numbers May Be Overstated

Even though the balance goes up every month the numbers Lending Club provide on their account details screen can be misleading. I have written about the difference between actual return and Lending Club NAR before and I am going to stress this again today. You may look at the screen shot above and believe I am earning 9.73% on my account right now, but that number is a slight exaggeration.

To get an accurate picture of your Lending Club returns you need to look at your monthly statements. The numbers there show your actual balance at the end of every month, whereas the account total figure above includess an estimate of your accrued interest, but this interest is not actually yours until the borrower actually pays the interest. You can read a brief explanation of accrued interest here.

Take a look at the spreadsheet below. This shows my actual account balance (taken from my statements) for the last four quarters on this PRIME account. I have also computed my annualized ROI based on these numbers (please note: the October 2010 quarter numbers do not compute correctly because there was a $533 bonus that I backed out so I could compare apples to apples).

[table id=17 /]

A few months ago I started recording my NAR every day from the Lending Club home screen to really see how it changed over time. So, I have an accurate number for the three months ending July 31, 2011. My average NAR according to Lending Club during this quarter was 9.84% and yet when you look at my account based on my statement balance the actual return earned was 7.64% – quite a large difference.

[Update: It was pointed out by a reader that I didn’t provide an annual ROI figure, just annualized ROI based on quarterly numbers. My annual real world ROI is 9.42% (backing out the $533 bonus) – much closer to the 9.73% stated by Lending Club.]

Why the Difference?

Some of it can be explained by the fact that some money sits in idle cash, but Lending Club is pretty good about reinvesting. They average a reinvestment about every 10 days so the average cash sitting in the account is only around $400. I think the main reason for the difference is in defaults. I had six charged off loans during the quarter with a total principal loss of $496 which reduced my end of quarter account balance. These six defaults reduced my NAR by 1.02% but with a $496 hit in that quarter my annualized ROI was reduced by 3.40%. From my math this accounts for most of the difference between the two numbers.

All these calculations are relatively simple because I had no cash inflows or outflows on this account in the past year. Most people will be adding or subtracting from their account in which case I recommend using the XIRR calculation to work out an actual return.

With several more late notes I expect my annualized real world return to dip well under 7% and maybe even below 6% before stabilizing somewhere around 7-9% by this time next year. For the hands-off PRIME account I think that is a decent return. I will be reporting back here on this account’s progress so you can the progress on this account over time.

  • Peter Renton
    Peter Renton

    Peter Renton is the chairman and co-founder of Fintech Nexus, the world’s largest digital media company focused on fintech. Peter has been writing about fintech since 2010 and he is the author and creator of the Fintech One-on-One Podcast, the first and longest-running fintech interview series.

    View all posts
Tags
Lending ClubNARPRIMEROI
Related

LendingClub exceeds expectations in strong Q1 earnings

LendingClub delivers better than expected earnings in Q4 2023

New SBA Lending Rules Are Only a Start

lending club q42022 presentation

LendingClub outlines cautious approach to support long-term growth

Popular Posts

Today:

  • Paraform Founders, Jeffrey Li and John KimFunded: Paraform raises $20M to put top recruiters, not AI, in the driver’s seat Jun. 27, 2025
  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025
  • Ahead of AIOutsmart Pricing Objections Before They Arise with AI Jul. 1, 2025
  • Globe-money-symbolsOPINION: Why Brazil and India are leading the global digital shift through payment innovation Jun. 24, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • Email-AI-pieceAvatar CEOs Have Entered the Meeting Jun. 18, 2025
  • ai-work-nexusWalkMe Vets Declare War on SaaS Bloat with $10M Seed for Autonomous Agents Jun. 10, 2025
  • Gazing Into the IPO Crystal BallKlarna Now, A Deluge Later? Mar. 20, 2025
  • Ben Hemani, Founding Partner at Bison VenturesThe Risk and Reward of Betting Big on AI’s Next Frontier Jun. 4, 2025
  • DanMurphy-FN-headshotCFPB’s Next Open Banking Battle Begins Jun. 3, 2025

This month:

  • WP UmbrellaTo Bank or Not to Bank: The ILC Question Jun. 5, 2025
  • GreenliteAI-Alex-WillGreenlite AI is on a mission to revolutionize banking compliance Jun. 10, 2025
  • DanMurphy-FN-headshotCFPB’s Next Open Banking Battle Begins Jun. 3, 2025
  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025
  • ai-work-nexusWalkMe Vets Declare War on SaaS Bloat with $10M Seed for Autonomous Agents Jun. 10, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • Ironclad State of AI ReportThe Economics of AI Trust Jun. 11, 2025
  • Email-AI-pieceAvatar CEOs Have Entered the Meeting Jun. 18, 2025
  • Ben Hemani, Founding Partner at Bison VenturesThe Risk and Reward of Betting Big on AI’s Next Frontier Jun. 4, 2025
  • TechNexus The AI IssueMeeker’s AI Bombshell + The VC Betting on AI Reshaping The Physical World  Jun. 4, 2025

  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2025 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results