Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
TPRM simplified with Mirato’s Industry Landscape map
ShareTweet
TPRM industry map
Home
Banking
TPRM simplified with Mirato’s Industry Landscape map

TPRM simplified with Mirato’s Industry Landscape map

Tony Zerucha·
Fintech
·Aug. 25, 2022·3 min read

As third-party vendors’ use increases, monitoring their risk has become more critical and complex. At the same time, the number of third-party risk management (TPRM) solutions on the market has proliferated, making it hard to keep track.

Mirato simplifies the process of understanding the many TPRM producers with its TPRM Industry Landscape Map. The map places technology vendors into their most relevant categories: data sources, governance, risk and compliance, evidence aggregation, and service provision. 

TPRM becomes more challenging in highly regulated industries

TPRM becomes incredibly complex in highly regulated industries, Mirato’s director of financial services for TPRM, Brian Shaw, said. Those requirements increase every year. Boards have increased their focus on managing third-party risk.

Shaw said it is similar to companies’ reference checks on prospective employees. The more responsibilities that an employee has, the deeper you dig.

Now multiply that onus hundreds of times when managing third-party risk, Shaw said. Banks may rely on third parties for 80% of their IT and customer-facing functions. Add up all agents, brokers, managers, and dealers; a big bank could have 70,000 third parties. One large bank has to assess its third parties against 47 different authorities.

“It can be a six-month process to bring a third party on because of all the IT, financial viability, reputation checks, and all these things,” Shaw said.

Graphic showing company map

Amid the automation, manual work and risk remain

While these processes have become more automated, plenty of manual work remains. Financial services companies can spend millions of dollars hiring people to do this work. And when humans are involved, there are inconsistencies, fluctuating objectivity, and a lack of process integrity.

Mirato uses natural language processing and artificial intelligence to read TPRM documentation and shorten processing times from months to weeks and from weeks to days. That allows institutions to more rapidly onboard revenue-generating partners, improve process integrity, and produce a reliable audit trail.

TPRM was in dire need of improvement, Mirato CMO Daniel Ravner added. Even though the risk is complicated and ever-evolving, how it is addressed hasn’t changed.

Mirato’s solution is to add a layer or engine to existing TPRM tools.

“What Salesforce is to customer management, what Google did for marketing, we want to do for TPRM,” Ravner said.

Factors to consider when developing a TPRM strategy

Because financial institutions have more responsibilities to regulators, many workplace automation tools that provide scores are insufficient.

“Banks have to look at the score of the third party,” Shaw explained. “Are they financially viable or on a bad actors’ list? Are there any terrorists among their executives and board?”

That is only the first step, he cautioned. What level of service is the third party providing? The answer dictates how deep the assessment runs. Banks also have to prove their process to regulators.

Good or bad, companies will have some third-party process, Shaw said. What Mirato does is enhance those existing processes and reduce manual contributions.

Related:

  • Five TPRM trends to watch for in the second half of 2022
  • Ocrolus Maps the Fintech Lending Ecosystem
  • Podcast 298: Genevieve Juillard of Experian Marketing Services

He added that many institutions do not have the resources to monitor third-party risk adequately. That forces choices like managing the obvious high risks and leaving second and third-tier risks unaddressed. Some companies ask their third parties to self-report.

Ravner said existing TPRM maps are either too complicated to be useful or are behind paywalls. To simplify the graphic, companies were placed in the cluster they are most known for

“We’re looking at the documents and the data that define the evidence that supports if you can bring the third party on and if you want to still do business with them before comparing that against your ruleset,” he explained. “Nobody’s doing that.

“The point of the map is to give a visual, immediate sense of who the different players are (in TPRM) and what they do within the space.”

Mirato recently published five TPRM trends to watch for in 2022. Read our story here.

  • Tony Zerucha
    Tony Zerucha

    Tony is a long-time contributor in the fintech and alt-fi spaces. A two-time LendIt Journalist of the Year nominee and winner in 2018, Tony has written more than 2,000 original articles on the blockchain, peer-to-peer lending, crowdfunding, and emerging technologies over the past seven years. He has hosted panels at LendIt, the CfPA Summit, and DECENT's Unchained, a blockchain exposition in Hong Kong. Email Tony here.

    View all posts

Tags
Brian ShawDaniel RavnerMiratothird-party risk managementTPRM Industry Landscape Map
Related
photo illustration of padlock with computer

Five TPRM trends to watch for in the second half of 2022

Popular Posts

Today:

  • Copy of Fintech Nexus – Newsletter Creative (1)Unpacking PayPal’s Missed Moment: 7 Takeaways Feb. 5, 2026
  • Copy of Fintech Nexus – Newsletter CreativeWhy PDF Table Extraction Fails in Production—and What Banks Need to Do About It Feb. 5, 2026
  • Chris Taylor Fractional AIFractional AI’s CEO Chris Taylor on Scaling the Unscalable Jul. 23, 2025
  • 122In Founders We Trust Aug. 6, 2025
  • Fintech Nexus HeaderBanks, Fintechs, and the Great Data Debate Sep. 11, 2025
  • Multiply CEO MichaelMultiply Mortgage CEO on AI’s move into housing finance Nov. 6, 2025
  • FundedFunded: Reevo lands $80M seed to unify GTM chaos into one AI-native system Nov. 7, 2025
  • Pranav MistryAI Wearables Are Entering Boardrooms, But Are The Safety Rules Ready? Dec. 3, 2025

This month:

  • Copy of Fintech Nexus – Newsletter Creative (1)Unpacking PayPal’s Missed Moment: 7 Takeaways Feb. 5, 2026
  • Diya JollyXero’s Jolly on building a tech roadmap to level playing field for small businesses Jan. 14, 2026
  • 2026 FintechWhat does 2026 hold for Fintech?  Jan. 29, 2026
  • Fintech 3.0Fintech 3.0 Runs on Stablecoins: Norwest VP Jordan Leites Shares Fintech’s Next Infrastructure Gains Jan. 15, 2026
  • TISC Salmon Problem HD“The Salmon Problem” – Building AI For High Stakes Decision Making Jan. 22, 2026
  • Copy of Fintech Nexus – Newsletter CreativeWhy PDF Table Extraction Fails in Production—and What Banks Need to Do About It Feb. 5, 2026
  • Lin Qiao HDOPINION: Renting Intelligence is a Losing Game; Successful Enterprises Will Own It Jan. 22, 2026
  • FNThe Credit Building Boom: Innovation or Score Manipulation? Jan. 8, 2026
  • 2026 Investor Predictions for AI and Data10 Investor Predictions for AI and Data in 2026 Dec. 17, 2025
  • Jeff Radke AccelerantAs Accelerant IPOs on NYSE, CEO Jeff Radke Hopes to Usher In Insurtech 3.0 Jul. 24, 2025

More News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2026 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results