Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
OnDeck Reports Q2 2016 Results and Continues to Grow Originations
ShareTweet
Home
Peer to Peer Lending
OnDeck Reports Q2 2016 Results and Continues to Grow Originations

OnDeck Reports Q2 2016 Results and Continues to Grow Originations

Fintech Nexus Staff·
Peer to Peer Lending
·Aug. 9, 2016·3 min read

OnDeck_Growth
OnDeck announced a record $590 million in originations for Q2 2016 in yesterdays earnings report. This is an increase from $569 million from Q1 2016. They have also crossed the $5 billion mark in total small business loan originations.

As we reported on last quarter, OnDeck has continued to hold more loans on their own balance sheet and this trend continues. CEO Noah Breslow provided an update to this end in the press release:

Our leadership position and diversified funding model enabled us to produce solid results this quarter. Although financial comparisons continue to be affected by our planned reduction in Marketplace sales and its resulting accounting impacts, we believe that retaining a greater percentage of loans on our balance sheet is the right decision for the long-term economics of the business. To that end, our Unpaid Principal Balance grew 57% year-over-year, which will drive future gross revenue.

The Unpaid Principal Balance now totals $790 million and is up 57% from the prior year period. Cash and equivalents total $78 million, down from $160 million at end of December 2015. The decrease in cash is directly related to the increase of funding loans on balance sheet.

Below are the key financial highlights taken from the press release:

  • Gross revenue was $69.5 million for the quarter, up 10% from the prior year period.
  • Net revenue was $28.9 million for the quarter, down 33% from the prior year period.
  • GAAP net loss attributable to OnDeck common stockholders was $17.9 million for the quarter, compared to net income of $5.0 million in the prior year period.
  • Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $12.4 million for the quarter, compared to positive $8.7 million in the prior year period.
  • Adjusted Net Loss was $14.0 million for the quarter, compared to Adjusted Net Income of $7.3 million in the prior year period.

When trying to understand OnDeck as a company, it’s important to understand what holding more loans on their balance sheet means from a financial perspective. The financial highlights above at a glance paint a pretty negative picture but there is more to the story.  Historically, OnDeck has captured more revenue directly from the sales charge called “gain on sale revenue” due to selling loans on their marketplace. This gain is realized immediately and boosts quarterly revenue when a larger portion of loans are sold.

When loans are kept on their balance sheet, the income is realized over time as loans repay which explains in part the decrease in net revenue. In addition, the company has higher provision expenses since this expense for loans held on their balance sheet is realized immediately even though the loans pay out over time. Q2 2016 provision expenses were $32.3 million, up from $15.5 million in the same period last year. This increase is to be expected as there was a 74% increase in loans designated to be held on balance sheet over the same time period.

The below donut charts show the funding mix for the past three quarters. While the marketplace made up just under half of funding in Q4 2015, this has dropped to around 25% in Q2 2016. Securitization remains a fairly consistent source over the last three quarters.

OnDeck_Investor_Mix_Q415OnDeck_Investor_Mix_Q116OnDeck_Funding_MixQ2_2016

This flexibility of funding, although important to OnDeck’s business model is something that might be challenging for analysts as revenues are directly affected by the mix on any given quarter. However, the market is responding favorably to their earnings with the stock price up around 12% at time of writing. OnDeck provided guidance for Q3 2016, projecting revenues between $73 and $76 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss between $9 million and $11 million.

Conclusion

It has been a challenging year on the investor side of the equation for many marketplace lenders. At least for now OnDeck’s hybrid funding model has served them well. They were able to grow originations quarter over quarter unlike many of their competitors. It will be interesting to watch the next few quarters to see if the trend of holding loans on their balance sheet continues. Stockholders of OnDeck looking to see more revenue will have to be patient, but it’s encouraging to see OnDeck continue their origination growth in turbulent times for the industry.

  • Fintech Nexus Staff
    Fintech Nexus Staff

    This piece was created by one of our content team members. Reach us at [email protected]

    View all posts
Tags
EarningsOnDeckQ2 2016
Related

Affirm hits it out of the park with their earnings

MoneyLion reports on record-breaking quarter in Q1

LatAm’s Mercado Libre plows ahead with 50M fintech clients

SoFi reports strong Q1 revenue and profits

Popular Posts

Today:

  • TechNexus The AI IssueAI’s Existential Opportunity Jul. 9, 2025
  • Penny LeeThe Battle for Open Banking’s Future Jul. 10, 2025
  • WayfoundThe AI Agent Wild West Jul. 9, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • National Student Loan DebtIf student loan domino falls, what’s next for fintechs in the sector? May. 13, 2025
  • Vesey Ventures – Julia HuangWhy agentic AI will spark commerce’s next PayPal moment Apr. 10, 2025
  • LoganAllinThe “Third Wave” Volatility Strategy for Fintech Investors Apr. 24, 2025
  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025
  • Fintech NexusErebor’s Gambit: Silicon Valley’s Defense Titans Target Banking Charter Jul. 9, 2025
  • Stylizedhouse-with-EKGFintech x the One Big Beautiful Bill Jun. 26, 2025

This month:

  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • WP UmbrellaTo Bank or Not to Bank: The ILC Question Jun. 5, 2025
  • ai-work-nexusWalkMe Vets Declare War on SaaS Bloat with $10M Seed for Autonomous Agents Jun. 10, 2025
  • Email-AI-pieceAvatar CEOs Have Entered the Meeting Jun. 18, 2025
  • KanyiThe World According to Kanyi Maqubela Jul. 8, 2025
  • GreenliteAI-Alex-WillGreenlite AI is on a mission to revolutionize banking compliance Jun. 10, 2025
  • Globe-money-symbolsOPINION: Why Brazil and India are leading the global digital shift through payment innovation Jun. 24, 2025
  • Revised-AI-InvoiceAI Faces Skepticism. Startups Say: OK, Pay When it Works Jun. 25, 2025
  • Stylizedhouse-with-EKGFintech x the One Big Beautiful Bill Jun. 26, 2025

  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2025 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results