Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
Sift’s Fraud Industry Benchmarking Resource (FIBR) shows fintechs how they stack up
ShareTweet
Home
AI
Sift’s Fraud Industry Benchmarking Resource (FIBR) shows fintechs how they stack up

Sift’s Fraud Industry Benchmarking Resource (FIBR) shows fintechs how they stack up

Tony Zerucha·
Fraud/Identity
·Feb. 7, 2024·2 min read

Sift’s new Fraud Industry Benchmarking Resource (FIBR) lets fraud and risk professionals see how their business’ security tools stack up against the competition. FIBR posts payment fraud attack rates, fraudulent chargeback rates, and manual review rates against aggregated industry averages over time, using Sift’s one trillion-plus processed transactions. Rates are broken down by industry and geography.

CMO Armen Najarian said he often hears from executives wondering how their fraud rates compare to their competitors. Across industries and geographies, Sift customers see an average payment fraud attack (block) rate of 2.5%. That is attempted payment fraud rates that Sift detects and prevents in real-time. The Merchant Risk Council (MRC) reports an average 4% order rejection rate globally.

Sift customers average a 0.08% fraudulent chargeback rate, 97% lower than the 2.6% rate reported by the MRC. The MRC found global merchants manually screen an average of 19% of all e-commerce orders. Sift slices that down to 2.1%.

Najarian said Sift began using the data a year ago during different reviews they held with clients. Then in early summer, they decided to make the data available to anyone interested via FIBR. With so many people looking to compare themselves to the Joneses, why not let everyone do it?

Currently, data seekers can check either by industry or geography. Soon, they can do both and get insights on account creation, log-ins and other KPIs. With more than one year of data, FIBR allows annual comparisons, too.

What FIBR shows in the Americas

A quick look at Central and South America fraud attack rates shows they are consistently higher each quarter. Najarian suggests that this is because top fraud control use is inconsistent across the region. With lower levels of control, Latin America may invite more fraud attempts.

“This region is starting to invest not just in the tools but the people,” Najarian said. “We’re seeing, especially in the last several quarters, more talent being hired, put into place and promoted. That might explain why we’re seeing that region overachieve in the manual versus the rest of the population.”

A FIBR example showing BNPL-related fraud rates

In North America, FIBR shows rates generally track to global averages. There is room for first-party (aka friendly) fraud to work as science struggles to identify aberrant behavior from otherwise normal customers.

Crypto volumes returning

FIBR tracks many key fintech sub-sectors and also cryptocurrency. Najarian sees crypto transaction volumes returning. Payment fraud attack rates are higher in crypto.

“That’s just consistent with not seeing full regulation in all markets with all crypto transactions,” Najarian said. “And there’s a nuance here where using crypto as a payment vehicle is one thing we’re looking at. We’re also looking at moving crypto through open banking. Between those two, I think that supports the reality that with lighter regulation, especially in some markets, with this being a newer space still, there’s absolutely some room for exploitation, and we’re seeing the attack volume this year was higher.”

But post-chargeback fraud rates in crypto are lower. Najarian credits people.

“The amount of talent flowing into the space is pretty strong. We’re also seeing, perhaps, some effect on manual reviews. It’s more effective manual reviews. So even though the manual review rate is lower, in general, versus the general population, we’re seeing some really good talents and good leadership and fraud management that are maybe helping to drive better decisioning faster.”

Also read:

How AI is fueling the fraud surge: Sift report
  • Tony Zerucha
    Tony Zerucha

    Tony is a long-time contributor in the fintech and alt-fi spaces. A two-time LendIt Journalist of the Year nominee and winner in 2018, Tony has written more than 2,000 original articles on the blockchain, peer-to-peer lending, crowdfunding, and emerging technologies over the past seven years. He has hosted panels at LendIt, the CfPA Summit, and DECENT's Unchained, a blockchain exposition in Hong Kong. Email Tony here.

    View all posts
Tags
Armen NajarianFIBRfraudfriendly fraudSift
Related

Study reveals half of Brits are now more wary of online banking, with online fraud a key concern

Joel Sequeira, Director of Product at IDology, on using AI in identity verification

Incognia’s location-based solutions offer fraud antidote

Superhuman AI - Fintech Nexus Newsletter

Editorial Cartoon for April 11, 2024

Popular Posts

Today:

  • Check-and-gusto-logoPayroll Is a Nightmare. Can Embedded Finance Fix It? Mar. 27, 2025
  • July 30th FN AI articleThe AI-Powered Ad Machine Jul. 30, 2025
  • Fintech ForecastWhy Every Lender Should Be Using Cash Flow Underwriting Today Jul. 29, 2025
  • Caspian (2)Funded: Caspian lands $5.4M seed to automate tariff management Aug. 1, 2025
  • FN-US-payment ForecastThe U.S. Payments Modernization that Wasn’t Jul. 31, 2025
  • Funded MomentFunded: Sunsave lands £113M to scale solar subscriptions and go all-in on home energy Jul. 25, 2025
  • Jeff Radke AccelerantAs Accelerant IPOs on NYSE, CEO Jeff Radke Hopes to Usher In Insurtech 3.0 Jul. 24, 2025
  • Pat UtzAbstract CEO on RegTech in the era of Trump 2.0 Jul. 17, 2025
  • Dr Luke BarrWhen the Copilot Becomes the Pilot (and You Stop Flying) Jul. 16, 2025
  • WayfoundThe AI Agent Wild West Jul. 9, 2025

This month:

  • Penny LeeThe Battle for Open Banking’s Future Jul. 10, 2025
  • Fintech ForecastWhy Every Lender Should Be Using Cash Flow Underwriting Today Jul. 29, 2025
  • KanyiThe World According to Kanyi Maqubela Jul. 8, 2025
  • Eric GlymanHow Ramp’s CEO Eric Glyman is betting big on AI agents Jul. 15, 2025
  • WayfoundThe AI Agent Wild West Jul. 9, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • Pat UtzAbstract CEO on RegTech in the era of Trump 2.0 Jul. 17, 2025
  • Jeff Radke AccelerantAs Accelerant IPOs on NYSE, CEO Jeff Radke Hopes to Usher In Insurtech 3.0 Jul. 24, 2025
  • TechNexus The AI IssueAI’s Existential Opportunity Jul. 9, 2025
  • Dr Luke BarrWhen the Copilot Becomes the Pilot (and You Stop Flying) Jul. 16, 2025

  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2025 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results