Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
Three Bloggers Share Their P2P Lending Results
ShareTweet
Home
News Roundup
Three Bloggers Share Their P2P Lending Results

Three Bloggers Share Their P2P Lending Results

Peter Renton·
News Roundup
·Jan. 6, 2011·3 min read

The last week has been a banner week for those wanting to find out details of how successful p2p investors put together their portfolios. We have had three leading personal finance bloggers share intimate details of their returns on Lending Club. Here is a quick analysis.

Steadfast Finances – first cab off the rank was Matt with Steadfast Finances. He also has the best return on his investment of the three bloggers with a 15.64% NAR. Matt has a strict investment policy of only investing $25 per loan and looking for borrowers who have job security. His portfolio consists of 279 loans with grades primarily C, D and E, but he has a renewed focus on loans with a NAR of 15% pre more so new loans are mainly grades D, E, F and G. He is adding to his portfolio to the tune of $100 to $150 per week and he spends 1-2 hours a week scouring loans to invest in. He has been an investor for 18 months and has no defaults as of yet, although there are five loans running late. But even that has changed as he shared on Twitter yesterday with two of his late loans returning to current status. Here is one of Matt’s helpful hints:

Don’t invest too much too fast. I know the temptation of investing in something new and cool is difficult to fight, but as with most things in life, exercise some patience by easing into P2P lending. Learn the ropes, get comfortable with the concept of investing in P2P lending before investing $10,000 into your account and end up investing $1000 per person. In my opinion, that’s the wrong way to go about it.

Bible Money Matters – Peter Anderson has also had zero defaults and just one out of 79 loans is running late. That is an impressive effort after almost two years on Lending Club. His NAR is running 9.64% and his focus is on smaller loans, those under $10,000. He has mainly invested in Grade A and B loans but after he has read the updates from Matt with Steadfast Finances he has decided to stray into the higher risk loans a little bit. He believes in investing in borrowers with a low debt-to-income ratio and also looks for loans that are over 60% funded. Here is another helpful hint from Peter:

I like to ask questions from potential borrowers. You can tell a lot about someone, and about how they’ll do repaying the loan, by how they answer the questions.

Investor Junkie – the return for Investor Junkie (IJ) fits between Steadfast Finances and Bible Money Matters. IJ (the blog author doesn’t reveal his name) is currently enjoying an NAR of 11.42%. He has one default in about 18 months on 189 loans (graded primarily B, C, and D), and there is one note that is currently late. IJ’s philosophy is to only invest in 36 month notes and because of his strict criteria he only invests small amounts at a time. It took him over six weeks to invest the $2,000 he recently added. Here is another great tip from IJ:

I have very few ‘A’ rated notes. I’ve deemed them actually riskier for the rate of return than the lower grade notes. I would rather take risk on a higher NAR loan with what Lending Club deems riskier and has a higher rate of default. If you look at the statistics this is what they show.

There was another Lending Club review posted just yesterday but it didn’t delve into the detail that these three bloggers did.

Just one point I want to make about these NAR’s. These p2p investors have all been investing in Lending Club for less than two years and because they add new money regularly the median age of the loans they are invested in is likely to be well less than a year old. So while it is very impressive that there is only one default between them, most of their loans are still relatively new and have not had much of a chance to default. So my guess is defaults will rise for all three but with their stringent investment criteria they should be able to keep the number of defaults low. But any default will negatively impact their NAR.

I appreciate these three gentlemen sharing the details of their investments, it helps the entire p2p lending community. I will be keeping a close eye on them as they to continue to report their progress. Speaking of NAR, stay tuned for tomorrow’s blog post for an in depth look at NAR and how Lending Club and Prosper’s stated NAR differs somewhat from the actual real world return.

  • Peter Renton
    Peter Renton

    Peter Renton is the chairman and co-founder of Fintech Nexus, the world’s largest digital media company focused on fintech. Peter has been writing about fintech since 2010 and he is the author and creator of the Fintech One-on-One Podcast, the first and longest-running fintech interview series.

    View all posts

Tags
Bible Money MattersInvestor junkieLending ClubNARp2p analysisSteadfast Finances
Related

LendingClub exceeds expectations in strong Q1 earnings

LendingClub delivers better than expected earnings in Q4 2023

New SBA Lending Rules Are Only a Start

lending club q42022 presentation

LendingClub outlines cautious approach to support long-term growth

Popular Posts

Today:

  • Paraform Founders, Jeffrey Li and John KimFunded: Paraform raises $20M to put top recruiters, not AI, in the driver’s seat Jun. 27, 2025
  • Ahead of AIOutsmart Pricing Objections Before They Arise with AI Jul. 1, 2025
  • Email-AI-pieceAvatar CEOs Have Entered the Meeting Jun. 18, 2025
  • Revised-AI-InvoiceAI Faces Skepticism. Startups Say: OK, Pay When it Works Jun. 25, 2025
  • TechNexus The AI IssueSteal Like an AI? Defining Fair Use & Creativity Jun. 25, 2025
  • GreenliteAI-Alex-WillGreenlite AI is on a mission to revolutionize banking compliance Jun. 10, 2025
  • PayabliFunded: Payments infrastructure co Payabli lands $28M Series B to AI-ify Jun. 20, 2025
  • TechNexus The AI IssueThe AI Paradox Jun. 18, 2025
  • WP-Funded2Funded: Maze nabs $25M Series A to stop cloud breaches before they start Jun. 13, 2025
  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025

This month:

  • WP UmbrellaTo Bank or Not to Bank: The ILC Question Jun. 5, 2025
  • GreenliteAI-Alex-WillGreenlite AI is on a mission to revolutionize banking compliance Jun. 10, 2025
  • DanMurphy-FN-headshotCFPB’s Next Open Banking Battle Begins Jun. 3, 2025
  • Current stablecoin adoptionWhy Banks (and Fintechs) Need to Embrace Stablecoins Today Jun. 12, 2025
  • ai-work-nexusWalkMe Vets Declare War on SaaS Bloat with $10M Seed for Autonomous Agents Jun. 10, 2025
  • Jon StonaTips from Airwallex x McLaren on Making the Best of a Fintech Sponsorship  Jun. 18, 2025
  • Ironclad State of AI ReportThe Economics of AI Trust Jun. 11, 2025
  • Email-AI-pieceAvatar CEOs Have Entered the Meeting Jun. 18, 2025
  • Ben Hemani, Founding Partner at Bison VenturesThe Risk and Reward of Betting Big on AI’s Next Frontier Jun. 4, 2025
  • TechNexus The AI IssueMeeker’s AI Bombshell + The VC Betting on AI Reshaping The Physical World  Jun. 4, 2025

  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2025 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results